I think the next few years are going to be the time when small companies will fall prey to bigger and richer hunters in the supply chain world. The current economic conditions are testing each and every logistics or freight forwarder in the business. The companies who have a stronger P&L and adoptability to the market condition will survive , while others will fall prey to the bigger and stronger.
There is no text book written or there is no single concept which is proven as the best practise for Merger and Acquisition (M&A) in our logistics and supply chain industry . But it's a much debated topic among many experienced companies who have done many M&As . Through out my career , I have seen many M&As , big and small. Some of them have been a great buy and others were left to a name board only . I cannot find any reason to disagree with the methods that were applied to do these M&As ,but the results have been negative and positive .
If we really think about a M&A , we need to ask ourselves , why a company wants to sell and why another company wants to buy . In most cases , I have seen that these two questions are not understood by both parties in a M&A . if we try to spend time to understand the seller's intentions and buyer's intentions , it will open a path for a smooth merger . The positive M&As that I have seen have always had this question answered and I also saw both parties working towards the same goal .
In my personal opinion , buying a company is not a very difficult situation . if you have the right people who understand the business , doing the due diligence and if you have the sharpest financial team analysing the results , then it is not too difficult to agree on an enterprise value and discuss the prices . But I think the difficult part is merging the two organisations and achieving the objectives .
When we talk about M&A , on the one hand we have seen some companies who were bought ,being left alone to do their business . On the other hand , some companies which were bought , and were merged immediately .
I personally think , the 'whether to merge or leave alone' strategy comes with the understanding of the first question . The intentions of the buyer and seller . In most cases the upper hand is with the company who buys another . There are two principles that every buyer should think about . Are you buying a company to expand your footprint ? if the answer is yes , then merge the company immediately, even if you have to go through a restructuring process ,and even if that's painful to the company and its employees . Delaying this will lose good people and business .
Are you buying a company to benefit from the business of the seller's company ? if the answer is yes , then give them the needed financial support and network support but leave them to do their business . Do not try to merge them as that was not your intention .
In summary , it's all about how much do you understand the buyer's intentions and seller's intentions .
We have seen billions of dollars lost during so many mergers and acquisitions in the past 10 years which we can name them . I have personally experienced M&A on the buyer's side and seller's side where I have seen both scenarios of final result .
Sunday 15 November 2015
Sunday 17 May 2015
Has rail from China to Europe , taken away the sea-air traffic via Dubai?
I have started to rebuild the sea-air product with new concepts . Its is true that Dubai as a hub has lost almost 40% of the sea-air volumes . Its could be even more . The main reason for this is, the consumer products available in the market and changing buying habits of the end customers . Everything boils down to cost and lead time .
I could see several reasons for the slow down of sea-air via Dubai . One is for sure the slow steaming adopted by the shipping lines which extends the transit time . From Hong Kong to Jebel Ali , it used ot be 11 days . Now its 12-13 days , sometimes even more days are consumed. The only ocean line (which I dont want to mention the name ) who used to offer a good sea-air service on the ocean leg, has also lost its motivation to keep the commitment on transit times . On the other hand , the retailers have changed the way they hold inventory . Less inventory in shops drive more air if the market picks up. But where have we seen the market picking up in recent days .
The latest buzz is everyone is rushing to do rail freight from China to Europe via Siberian route . China has its ambitions to control the freight from China to Europe , therefore pouring billions to develop this mode of transport . However in my opinion , a very dependable , capacity full filled product is at least 5 years away. I have often argued with people who says , rail is better than sea-air . I agree to a point that it stops at a theoretical point , but not go in to practicality . The reasons are simple . Today there are 3 train hubs in China , Suzhou , west China and North China . The trains line up the cargo at the western China to be carried on to Europe . A 40feet container could cost from a shanghai factory to a distribution centre in France aprox USD 8000 . Its far below the sea-air rates that are available in the market. The maximum length of this train until it reached the European rail standards if only 800 meters . Just calculate and see how many 40 feet containers can you carry every 2 days to Europe . aprox 45-48 containers a train ? I agree that its viable right now as the market is so low and there is no demand . But no one hopes this export market from China to Europe will stay like this for ever . When the market picks up , can everyone get space on a train that carries 45 containers ? think about the demand and supply ? I conclude this point of argument by admitting that rail from China to Europe is a good progress and a great achievement . However its not yet ready to take away the sea-air product via Dubai and other hubs . Once the rail products reach multiple journeys a day to europe and perhaps double stacking the containers , then yet , it could be a good alternative . Not until then .
One the other hand , people who believe in multimodal products like me , will always educate the customers about the benefits of sea-air , air-air and air-sea products . There is no limit to the way you can move freight on multimodal methods as long as you can be creative and knows how to ensure the product works .
I sincerely hope that Dubai government will take measures to speed up the sea-air transshipment process and reduce costs , allowing the freight forwarders to bring in more transshipment cargo to Dubai. Simplifying the process on how Dubai cooperates with Sharjah in terms of transshipment customs , open many possibilities . can UAE government influence the shipping lines to improve the transit time and ensure there is a dependable Ocean capacity and lead time guarantee to jebel Ali ? this could improve the transit times .
Times have come to be innovative in how you do sea-air products .
join my twitter for more news on sea-air : @chamindag1
other article to read
I could see several reasons for the slow down of sea-air via Dubai . One is for sure the slow steaming adopted by the shipping lines which extends the transit time . From Hong Kong to Jebel Ali , it used ot be 11 days . Now its 12-13 days , sometimes even more days are consumed. The only ocean line (which I dont want to mention the name ) who used to offer a good sea-air service on the ocean leg, has also lost its motivation to keep the commitment on transit times . On the other hand , the retailers have changed the way they hold inventory . Less inventory in shops drive more air if the market picks up. But where have we seen the market picking up in recent days .
The latest buzz is everyone is rushing to do rail freight from China to Europe via Siberian route . China has its ambitions to control the freight from China to Europe , therefore pouring billions to develop this mode of transport . However in my opinion , a very dependable , capacity full filled product is at least 5 years away. I have often argued with people who says , rail is better than sea-air . I agree to a point that it stops at a theoretical point , but not go in to practicality . The reasons are simple . Today there are 3 train hubs in China , Suzhou , west China and North China . The trains line up the cargo at the western China to be carried on to Europe . A 40feet container could cost from a shanghai factory to a distribution centre in France aprox USD 8000 . Its far below the sea-air rates that are available in the market. The maximum length of this train until it reached the European rail standards if only 800 meters . Just calculate and see how many 40 feet containers can you carry every 2 days to Europe . aprox 45-48 containers a train ? I agree that its viable right now as the market is so low and there is no demand . But no one hopes this export market from China to Europe will stay like this for ever . When the market picks up , can everyone get space on a train that carries 45 containers ? think about the demand and supply ? I conclude this point of argument by admitting that rail from China to Europe is a good progress and a great achievement . However its not yet ready to take away the sea-air product via Dubai and other hubs . Once the rail products reach multiple journeys a day to europe and perhaps double stacking the containers , then yet , it could be a good alternative . Not until then .
One the other hand , people who believe in multimodal products like me , will always educate the customers about the benefits of sea-air , air-air and air-sea products . There is no limit to the way you can move freight on multimodal methods as long as you can be creative and knows how to ensure the product works .
I sincerely hope that Dubai government will take measures to speed up the sea-air transshipment process and reduce costs , allowing the freight forwarders to bring in more transshipment cargo to Dubai. Simplifying the process on how Dubai cooperates with Sharjah in terms of transshipment customs , open many possibilities . can UAE government influence the shipping lines to improve the transit time and ensure there is a dependable Ocean capacity and lead time guarantee to jebel Ali ? this could improve the transit times .
Times have come to be innovative in how you do sea-air products .
join my twitter for more news on sea-air : @chamindag1
other article to read
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)